- Community Resilience (x)
- Search results
Search results
Islandora sort
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - Investing in Connectedness: Building social capital to save lives and aid recovery
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Matthew Pratt during the Resilience and Response Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "Investing in Connectedness: Building social capital to save lives and aid recovery".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
Traditionally experts have developed plans to prepare communities for disasters. This presentation discusses the importance of relationship-building and social capital in building resilient communities that are both 'prepared' to respond to disaster events, and 'enabled' to lead their own recovery. As a member of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority's Community Resilience Team, I will present the work I undertook to catalyse community recovery. I will draw from case studies of initiatives that have built community connectedness, community capacity, and provided new opportunities for social cohesion and neighbourhood planning. I will compare three case studies that highlight how social capital can aid recovery. Investment in relationships is crucial to aid preparedness and recovery.
- Creator(s)
- Matthew Pratt,
- Date
- 11:09pm 26th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, Matthew Pratt, community resilience, resilience, CERA, Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority, Resilience and Response Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - Resilience, Poverty, and Seismic Culture
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Richard Conlin during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "Resilience, Poverty, and Seismic Culture".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
A strategy of resilience is built around the recognition that effective emergency response requires community involvement and mobilization. It further recognizes that many of the characteristics that equip communities to respond most effectively to short term emergencies are also characteristics that build strong communities over the long term. Building resilient communities means integrating our approaches to poverty, community engagement, economic development, and housing into a coherent strategy that empowers community members to engage with each other and with other communities. In this way, resilience becomes a complementary concept to sustainability. This requires an asset-based change strategy where external agencies meet communities where they are, in their own space, and use collective impact approaches to work in partnership. This also requires understanding and assessing poverty, including physical, financial, and social capital in their myriad manifestations. Poverty is not exclusively a matter of class. It is a complex subject, and different communities manifest multiple versions of poverty, which must be respected and understood through the asset-based lens. Resilience is a quality of a community and a system, and develops over time as a result of careful analysis of strengths and vulnerabilities and taking actions to increase competencies and reduce risk situations. Resilience requires maintenance and must be developed in a way that includes practicing continuous improvement and adaptation. The characteristics of a resilient community include both physical qualities and 'soft infrastructure', such as community knowledge, resourcefulness, and overall health. This presentation reviews the experience of some earlier disasters, outlines a working model of how emergency response, resilience, and poverty interact and can be addressed in concert, and concludes with a summary of what the 2010 Chilean earthquake tells us about how a 'seismic culture' can function effectively in communities even when government suffers from unexpected shortcomings.
- Creator(s)
- Richard Conlin,
- Date
- 1:27am 27th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, Richard Conlin, resilience, poverty, community, Seattle, Chile, Community Resilience Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - A Qualitative Study of Paramedic Duty to Treat During Disaster Response
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Dr Erin Smith during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Qualitative Study of Paramedic Duty to Treat During Disaster Response".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
Disasters place unprecedented demands on emergency medical services and test paramedic personal commitment to the health care profession. Despite this challenge, legal guidelines, professional codes of ethics and ambulance service management guidelines are largely silent on the issue of professional obligations during disasters. They provide little to no guidance on what is expected of paramedics or how they ought to approach their duty to treat in the face of risk. This research explores how paramedics view their duty to treat during disasters. Reasons that may limit or override such a duty are examined. Understanding these issues is important in enabling paramedics to make informed and defensible decisions during disasters. The authors employed qualitative methods to gather Australian paramedic perspectives. Participants' views were analysed and organised according to three emerging themes: the scope of individual paramedic obligations, the role and obligations of ambulance services, and the broader ethical context. Our findings suggest that paramedic decisions around duty to treat will largely depend on their individual perception of risk and competing obligations. A reciprocal obligation is expected of paramedic employers. Ambulance services need to provide their employees with the best current information about risks in order to assist paramedics in making defensible decisions in difficult circumstances. Education plays a key role in providing paramedics with an understanding and appreciation of fundamental professional obligations by focusing attention on both the medical and ethical challenges involved with disaster response. Finally, codes of ethics might be useful, but ultimately paramedic decisions around professional obligations will largely depend on their individual risk assessment, perception of risk, and personal value systems.
- Creator(s)
- Erin Smith,
- Date
- 2:09am 27th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, Dr Erin Smith, disaster, response, paramedic, duty to treat, duty of care, Community Resilience Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Dr Scott Miles during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
A higher bar for advancing community disaster resilience can be set by conducting research and developing capacity-building initiatives that are based on understanding and monitoring community wellbeing. This presentation jumps off from this view, arguing that wellbeing is the most important concept for improving the disaster resilience of communities. The presentation uses examples from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes to illustrate the need and effectiveness of a wellbeing-centric approach. While wellbeing has been integrated in the Canterbury recovery process, community wellbeing and resilience need to guide research and planning. The presentation unpacks wellbeing in order to synthesize it with other concepts that are relevant to community disaster resilience. Conceptualizing wellbeing as either the opportunity for or achievement of affiliation, autonomy, health, material needs, satisfaction, and security is common and relatively accepted across non-disaster fields. These six variables can be systematically linked to fundamental elements of resilience. The wellbeing variables are subject to potential loss, recovery, and adaptation based on the empirically established ties to community identity, such as sense of place. Variables of community identity are what translate the disruption, damage, restoration, reconstruction, and reconfiguration of a community's different critical services and capital resources to different states of wellbeing across a community that has been impacted by a hazard event. With reference to empirical research and the Canterbury case study, the presentation integrates these insights into a robust framework to facilitate meeting the challenge of raising the standard of community disaster resilience research and capacity building through development of wellbeing-centric approaches.
- Creator(s)
- Scott Miles,
- Date
- 1:47am 27th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, Dr Scott Miles, disaster, resilience, wellbeing, community, identity, Community Resilience Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- Community resilience
- dc.description
-
Ch.3: Understanding Social Recovery report
This chapter discusses CERA's Community Resilience Programme which led and coordinated the psychosocial system of services and supports across a number of partner agencies. The programme enabled communities to continue to lead their own recovery and promoted effective community engagement. This chapter outlines these activities. The key lessons discussed will help you strategize and implement similar activities in your recovery context.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community in Mind Strategy
- dc.description
- The Community in Mind Strategy for rebuilding health and wellbeing in greater Christchurch.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Leadership and Governance, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: A systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011
- dc.description
- Extreme events and disasters cause distress and are associated with some people developing mental disorders. This literature recognises the distress which primary stressors cause and their association with mental disorders. Secondary stressors such as a lack of financial assistance, the gruelling process of submitting an insurance claim, and continued lack of infrastructure can manifest their effects shortly after a disaster and persist for extended periods of time.
- Creator(s)
- Sarah Lock, G James Rubin, Virginia Murray, M Brooke Rogers, Richard Amlôt, Richard Williams
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community-led disaster risk management: A Māori response to Otautahi (Christchurch) earthquakes
- dc.description
-
Since September 2010, a series of earthquakes have caused widespread social, financial and environmental devastation in Christchurch, New Zealand. Anecdotal evidence suggests that local Māori responded effectively to facilitate community recovery and resilience.
The Joint Centre for Disaster Research with Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, conducted research to identify the ways Māori cultural values have facilitated disaster risk reduction and management in response to the earthquakes.
- Creator(s)
- Christine M Kenney, Suzanne R Phibbs, Douglas Paton, John Reid, David Johnston
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Community Resilience
- dc.title
- Shakes, rattles and roll outs
- dc.description
-
The untold story of Māori engagement with community recovery, social resilience and urban sustainability in Christchurch, New Zealand
The Joint Centre for Disaster Research in partnership with the Christchurch Iwi (tribe) Ngāi Tahu, conducted research to identify and document the ways Māori cultural factors facilitated community resilience in response to the Canterbury earthquakes.
The Māori response to the Christchurch earthquakes and subsequent recovery process constitute an exemplar of best practice. This paper documents the different levels of support that were extended to whānau, communities and responding agencies.
- Creator(s)
- Christine M Kenney, Suzanne R Phibbs
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Community Resilience
- dc.title
- Call for Ideas to Remember
- dc.description
- In July 2014, CERA led a community engagement process to inform the design of the Canterbury Earthquake Memorial. The Memorial would be a place where people could honour the lives of those who died and acknowledge the shared trauma experienced by the people of Canterbury.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Built Environment, Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Christchurch Central City, Collaboration and Partnership, Communicating in Recovery, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Evaluation of the Canterbury Earthquake Appeal & Recovery Programme
- dc.description
- This document reports the results of an evaluation of the New Zealand Red Cross' (NZRC) Canterbury Earthquake Appeal Recovery Programme (CEARP). It contains a number of lessons for NZRC about how it should conduct recovery programming in the future. The evaluation approach was designed to combine both qualitative and quantitative research, and garner insights from a number of stakeholder groups.
- Creator(s)
- New Zealand Red Cross
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Resource Allocation, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery
- dc.title
- Monitoring wellbeing during recovery from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes: The CERA wellbeing survey
- dc.description
- This paper outlines the process and outcomes of a multi-agency, multi-sector research collaboration, led by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA).
- Creator(s)
- Jane Morgan, Annabel Begg, Sarah Beaven, Philip Schluter, Kath Jamieson, Sarbjit Johal, David Johnston, Mary Sparrow
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey September 2015
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey September 2014
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community engagement strategy and framework
- dc.description
- Early on, CERA developed a Community Engagement Strategy and a Community Engagement Framework to guide its work. These documents committed CERA to working transparently and inclusively. The goal was to enable communities and individuals to participate in decision making on rebuilding and revitalising greater Christchurch.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Communicating in Recovery, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Information sharing to support social recovery following a natural disaster
- dc.description
- Natural disasters cause major damage, but this can be mitigated with effective planning, response and recovery. It is broadly agreed that organisations must work together following a disaster to deliver the right services to meet individual and community needs. Sharing information among organisations is a key ingredient for effective collaboration.
- Creator(s)
- Andrew Bichan, Bruce Findlay, Cathy Philo, Danielle Pile, Matthew Power
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Recovery Policy, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index 2015
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index 2014
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index December 2013
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey April 2015
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery