- resilience (x)
- Search results
Search results
Islandora sort
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - Medical Clowning in Disaster Zones
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Thomas Petschner during the Resilience and Response Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "Medical Clowning in Disaster Zones".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
To be in a crisis caused by different kinds of natural disasters (as well as a man made incidents), dealing with ongoing increase of problems and frequent confrontation with very bad news isn't something that many people can easily cope with. This applies obviously to affected people but also to the members of SAR teams, doctors in the field and the experienced humanitarians too. The appropriate use of humour in crisis situations and dis-functional environments is a great tool to make those difficult moments more bearable for everyone. It helps injured and traumatised people cope with what they're facing, and can help them to recover more quickly too. At the same time humorous thinking can help to solve some of the complex problems emergency responders face. This is in addition to emergency and medical only reactions - allowing for a more holistic human perspective, which can provide a positive lasting effect. The ability to laugh is hardwired into our systems bringing a huge variety of physical, mental and social benefits. Even a simple smile can cultivate optimism and hope, while laughter can boost a hormone cocktail - which helps to cope with pain, enhance the immune system, reduce stress, re-focus, connect and unite people during difficult times. Humour as an element of psychological response in crisis situations is increasingly understood in a much wider sense: as the human capacity to plan and achieve desired outcomes with less stress, thus resulting in more 'predictable' work in unpredictable situations. So, if we approach certain problems in the same way Medical Clowns do, we may find a more positive solution. Everyone knows that laughter is an essential component of a healthy, happy life. The delivery of 'permission to laugh' into disaster zones makes a big difference to the quality of life for everyone, even if it's for a very short, but important period of time. And it's crucial to get it right as there is no second chance for the first response.
- Creator(s)
- Thomas Petschner,
- Date
- 12:24am 27th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, humour, health, Thomas Petschner, clowning, clown doctors, Resilience and Response Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- Earthquake Expectation Data
- dc.description
- A paper which details earthquake expectation data, supplied to SCIRT by GNS Science.
- Date
- 1:00pm 8th November 2012
- Tags
- whole of life cost, NPV, risk, resilience, design
- dc.title
- SCIRT and EQC Liquefaction Trial Report
- dc.description
- A report detailing the Liquefaction Trial, the observations, and discussions of the trial interpretation and findings.
- Creator(s)
- David Rowland, Marcus Gibson
- Date
- 12:00pm 20th May 2015
- Tags
- liquefaction, buried infrastructure, EQC, resilience, design standards
- dc.title
- People in Disasters Conference - A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience
- dc.description
-
A video of a presentation by Dr Scott Miles during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience".
The abstract for this presentation reads as follows:
A higher bar for advancing community disaster resilience can be set by conducting research and developing capacity-building initiatives that are based on understanding and monitoring community wellbeing. This presentation jumps off from this view, arguing that wellbeing is the most important concept for improving the disaster resilience of communities. The presentation uses examples from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes to illustrate the need and effectiveness of a wellbeing-centric approach. While wellbeing has been integrated in the Canterbury recovery process, community wellbeing and resilience need to guide research and planning. The presentation unpacks wellbeing in order to synthesize it with other concepts that are relevant to community disaster resilience. Conceptualizing wellbeing as either the opportunity for or achievement of affiliation, autonomy, health, material needs, satisfaction, and security is common and relatively accepted across non-disaster fields. These six variables can be systematically linked to fundamental elements of resilience. The wellbeing variables are subject to potential loss, recovery, and adaptation based on the empirically established ties to community identity, such as sense of place. Variables of community identity are what translate the disruption, damage, restoration, reconstruction, and reconfiguration of a community's different critical services and capital resources to different states of wellbeing across a community that has been impacted by a hazard event. With reference to empirical research and the Canterbury case study, the presentation integrates these insights into a robust framework to facilitate meeting the challenge of raising the standard of community disaster resilience research and capacity building through development of wellbeing-centric approaches.
- Creator(s)
- Scott Miles,
- Date
- 1:47am 27th February 2016
- Tags
- People in Disasters, conference, Dr Scott Miles, disaster, resilience, wellbeing, community, identity, Community Resilience Stream, Health and Wellbeing
- dc.title
- Community resilience
- dc.description
-
Ch.3: Understanding Social Recovery report
This chapter discusses CERA's Community Resilience Programme which led and coordinated the psychosocial system of services and supports across a number of partner agencies. The programme enabled communities to continue to lead their own recovery and promoted effective community engagement. This chapter outlines these activities. The key lessons discussed will help you strategize and implement similar activities in your recovery context.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community in Mind Strategy
- dc.description
- The Community in Mind Strategy for rebuilding health and wellbeing in greater Christchurch.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Leadership and Governance, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: A systematic review of primary research from 2010-2011
- dc.description
- Extreme events and disasters cause distress and are associated with some people developing mental disorders. This literature recognises the distress which primary stressors cause and their association with mental disorders. Secondary stressors such as a lack of financial assistance, the gruelling process of submitting an insurance claim, and continued lack of infrastructure can manifest their effects shortly after a disaster and persist for extended periods of time.
- Creator(s)
- Sarah Lock, G James Rubin, Virginia Murray, M Brooke Rogers, Richard Amlôt, Richard Williams
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community-led disaster risk management: A Māori response to Otautahi (Christchurch) earthquakes
- dc.description
-
Since September 2010, a series of earthquakes have caused widespread social, financial and environmental devastation in Christchurch, New Zealand. Anecdotal evidence suggests that local Māori responded effectively to facilitate community recovery and resilience.
The Joint Centre for Disaster Research with Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, conducted research to identify the ways Māori cultural values have facilitated disaster risk reduction and management in response to the earthquakes.
- Creator(s)
- Christine M Kenney, Suzanne R Phibbs, Douglas Paton, John Reid, David Johnston
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Community Resilience
- dc.title
- Shakes, rattles and roll outs
- dc.description
-
The untold story of Māori engagement with community recovery, social resilience and urban sustainability in Christchurch, New Zealand
The Joint Centre for Disaster Research in partnership with the Christchurch Iwi (tribe) Ngāi Tahu, conducted research to identify and document the ways Māori cultural factors facilitated community resilience in response to the Canterbury earthquakes.
The Māori response to the Christchurch earthquakes and subsequent recovery process constitute an exemplar of best practice. This paper documents the different levels of support that were extended to whānau, communities and responding agencies.
- Creator(s)
- Christine M Kenney, Suzanne R Phibbs
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Community Resilience
- dc.title
- Call for Ideas to Remember
- dc.description
- In July 2014, CERA led a community engagement process to inform the design of the Canterbury Earthquake Memorial. The Memorial would be a place where people could honour the lives of those who died and acknowledge the shared trauma experienced by the people of Canterbury.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Built Environment, Social Recovery Environment, Communication and Community Engagement, Christchurch Central City, Collaboration and Partnership, Communicating in Recovery, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Evaluation of the Canterbury Earthquake Appeal & Recovery Programme
- dc.description
- This document reports the results of an evaluation of the New Zealand Red Cross' (NZRC) Canterbury Earthquake Appeal Recovery Programme (CEARP). It contains a number of lessons for NZRC about how it should conduct recovery programming in the future. The evaluation approach was designed to combine both qualitative and quantitative research, and garner insights from a number of stakeholder groups.
- Creator(s)
- New Zealand Red Cross
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Resource Allocation, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery
- dc.title
- Monitoring wellbeing during recovery from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes: The CERA wellbeing survey
- dc.description
- This paper outlines the process and outcomes of a multi-agency, multi-sector research collaboration, led by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA).
- Creator(s)
- Jane Morgan, Annabel Begg, Sarah Beaven, Philip Schluter, Kath Jamieson, Sarbjit Johal, David Johnston, Mary Sparrow
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey September 2015
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey September 2014
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Community engagement strategy and framework
- dc.description
- Early on, CERA developed a Community Engagement Strategy and a Community Engagement Framework to guide its work. These documents committed CERA to working transparently and inclusively. The goal was to enable communities and individuals to participate in decision making on rebuilding and revitalising greater Christchurch.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Communication and Community Engagement, Collaboration and Partnership, Communicating in Recovery, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Information sharing to support social recovery following a natural disaster
- dc.description
- Natural disasters cause major damage, but this can be mitigated with effective planning, response and recovery. It is broadly agreed that organisations must work together following a disaster to deliver the right services to meet individual and community needs. Sharing information among organisations is a key ingredient for effective collaboration.
- Creator(s)
- Andrew Bichan, Bruce Findlay, Cathy Philo, Danielle Pile, Matthew Power
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Resilience, Recovery Policy, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index 2015
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index 2014
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- Canterbury Wellbeing Index December 2013
- dc.description
- The Canterbury Wellbeing was a collaborative project across many government agencies which tracked the progress of social recovery following the 2010/ 2011 earthquakes. It used indicators to identify emerging social trends and issues, providing communities and decisions makers with up to date, accurate and comprehensive information.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery
- dc.title
- CERA Wellbeing Survey April 2015
- dc.description
- The CERA Wellbeing Survey supplemented the data collected by a range of agencies for the Canterbury Wellbeing Index. It gathered self-reported wellbeing data about quality of life, levels of stress, stressors, positive outcomes and Canterbury residents' perceptions of the recovery. With a unique sample of 2,500 residents each wave, the data could be broken down to demographic and geographic sub-populations, enabling analysis of recovery progress at more detailed levels. Six-monthly reports were made publically available from September 2012 to September 2015.
- Creator(s)
- CERA (Canterbury Earthquakes Recovery Authority)
- Tags
- Social Recovery Environment, Understanding the Recovery Context, Resource Allocation, Collaboration and Partnership, Community Engagement, Community Resilience, Housing Recovery, Psychosocial Recovery, Recovery Policy, Residential Red Zone, Social Recovery